2006 Hanse 350 vs 1976 Ericson 29 — Comparison

2006 Hanse 350 2006 Hanse 350
VS
1976 Ericson 29 1976 Ericson 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2006 Hanse 350 1976 Ericson 29
General
Manufacturer Hanse Ericson
Year 2006–2012 1976–1983
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer Judel/Vrolijk Bruce King
Dimensions
LOA 10.58 m (34.7 ft) 8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL 9.40 m (30.8 ft) 7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam 3.52 m (11.5 ft) 2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft 1.85 m (6.1 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 55.5 m² (597 ft²) 34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 21 HP 13 HP
Fuel Capacity 75 L (19.8 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2006 Hanse 350
17.47
1976 Ericson 29
15.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2006 Hanse 350
29.31
1976 Ericson 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2006 Hanse 350
0.78
1976 Ericson 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2006 Hanse 350
17.52
1976 Ericson 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 2006 Hanse 350 and 1976 Ericson 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Hanse 350 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1976 Ericson 29 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 2006 Hanse 350 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1976 Ericson 29 was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the 2006 Hanse 350 measures 10.58m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.52m, compared to the 1976 Ericson 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 2006 Hanse 350 is 1.74m longer than the 1976 Ericson 29. The 2006 Hanse 350 displaces approximately 83% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2006 Hanse 350 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.47 and 55.5 m² of sail area. The 1976 Ericson 29, with an SA/D of 15.99 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2006 Hanse 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2006 Hanse 350 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1976 Ericson 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 29.3% for the 2006 Hanse 350 and 42.9% for the 1976 Ericson 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2006 Hanse 350 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The 1976 Ericson 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 Ericson 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2006 Hanse 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2006 Hanse 350 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS