2006 Hanse 350 vs 1979 Pearson 37 — Comparison

2006 Hanse 350
VS
1979 Pearson 371979 Pearson 37

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2006 Hanse 3501979 Pearson 37
General
ManufacturerHansePearson
Year2006–20121979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA10.58 m (34.7 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL9.40 m (30.8 ft)8.69 m (28.5 ft)
Beam3.52 m (11.5 ft)3.43 m (11.3 ft)
Draft1.85 m (6.1 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)7,258 kg (16,001 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)3,084 kg (6,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.5 m² (597 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity75 L (19.8 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2006 Hanse 350
17.47
1979 Pearson 37
15.18
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2006 Hanse 350
29.31
1979 Pearson 37
42.49
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2006 Hanse 350
0.78
1979 Pearson 37
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2006 Hanse 350
17.52
1979 Pearson 37
24.10

Detailed Comparison

The 2006 Hanse 350 and 1979 Pearson 37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Hanse 350 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1979 Pearson 37 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2006 Hanse 350 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1979 Pearson 37 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2006 Hanse 350 measures 10.58m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.52m, compared to the 1979 Pearson 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.43m beam. The 1979 Pearson 37 is 0.70m longer than the 2006 Hanse 350. The 1979 Pearson 37 displaces approximately 25% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2006 Hanse 350 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.47 and 55.5 m² of sail area. The 1979 Pearson 37, with an SA/D of 15.18 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2006 Hanse 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2006 Hanse 350 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1979 Pearson 37 has a comfort ratio of 24.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 29.3% for the 2006 Hanse 350 and 42.5% for the 1979 Pearson 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2006 Hanse 350 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The 1979 Pearson 37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Pearson 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2006 Hanse 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2006 Hanse 350 · 1979 Pearson 37