2006 Hanse 350 vs Hunter 380 — Comparison
2006 Hanse 350
Hunter 380
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2006 Hanse 350 | Hunter 380 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Hunter |
| Year | 2006–2012 | 2001–2005 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.58 m (34.7 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.40 m (30.8 ft) | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.52 m (11.5 ft) | 3.76 m (12.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) | 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) | 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 55.5 m² (597 ft²) | 64.0 m² (689 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 75 L (19.8 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 227 L (60.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2006 Hanse 350 and Hunter 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Hanse 350 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 380 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2006 Hanse 350 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The Hunter 380 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the 2006 Hanse 350 measures 10.58m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.52m, compared to the Hunter 380 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The Hunter 380 is 1.00m longer than the 2006 Hanse 350. The Hunter 380 displaces approximately 25% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2006 Hanse 350 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.47 and 55.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 380, with an SA/D of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2006 Hanse 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2006 Hanse 350 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Hunter 380 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 29.3% for the 2006 Hanse 350 and 37.5% for the Hunter 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2006 Hanse 350 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The Hunter 380 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2006 Hanse 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2006 Hanse 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hunter 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.