2006 Hanse 350 vs Hanse 320 — Comparison

2006 Hanse 350
VS
Hanse 320Hanse 320

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2006 Hanse 350Hanse 320
General
ManufacturerHanseHanse
Year2006–20122005–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyGermany
DesignerJudel/Vrolijkjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA10.58 m (34.7 ft)9.92 m (32.5 ft)
LWL9.40 m (30.8 ft)8.80 m (28.9 ft)
Beam3.52 m (11.5 ft)3.28 m (10.8 ft)
Draft1.85 m (6.1 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.5 m² (597 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity75 L (19.8 gal)90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2006 Hanse 350
17.47
Hanse 320
16.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2006 Hanse 350
29.31
Hanse 320
30.43
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2006 Hanse 350
0.78
Hanse 320
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2006 Hanse 350
17.52
Hanse 320
17.40

Detailed Comparison

The 2006 Hanse 350 and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Hanse 350 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 2006 Hanse 350 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 2006 Hanse 350 measures 10.58m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.52m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The 2006 Hanse 350 is 0.66m longer than the Hanse 320. The 2006 Hanse 350 displaces approximately 26% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2006 Hanse 350 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.47 and 55.5 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2006 Hanse 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2006 Hanse 350 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 29.3% for the 2006 Hanse 350 and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2006 Hanse 350 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2006 Hanse 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2006 Hanse 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2006 Hanse 350 · Hanse 320