Dufour 40 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

Dufour 40Dufour 40
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationDufour 401976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerDufourC&C Yachts
Year2007–20121976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceCanada
DesignerUmberto FelciCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA12.05 m (39.5 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.55 m (34.6 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.85 m (12.6 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.0 m² (732 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity160 L (42.3 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Dufour 40
17.56
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Dufour 40
30.77
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Dufour 40
0.78
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Dufour 40
16.44
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The Dufour 40 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Dufour 40 is a 2000s design by Dufour from France, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The Dufour 40 was penned by Umberto Felci. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the Dufour 40 measures 12.05m (39.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.85m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Dufour 40 is 1.99m longer than the 1976 C&C 33. The Dufour 40 displaces approximately 72% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Dufour 40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.56 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Dufour 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Dufour 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 30.8% for the Dufour 40 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Dufour 40 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 C&C 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Dufour 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Dufour 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Dufour 40 · 1976 C&C 33