Dufour 40 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

Dufour 40Dufour 40
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationDufour 401995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerDufourFeeling
Year2007–20121995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceFrance
DesignerUmberto FelciPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA12.05 m (39.5 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL10.55 m (34.6 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.85 m (12.6 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.0 m² (732 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity160 L (42.3 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Dufour 40
17.56
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Dufour 40
30.77
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Dufour 40
0.78
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Dufour 40
16.44
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The Dufour 40 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Dufour 40 is a 2000s design by Dufour from France, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Dufour 40 was penned by Umberto Felci. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the Dufour 40 measures 12.05m (39.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.85m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The Dufour 40 is 0.25m longer than the 1995 Feeling 39.

Looking at performance, the Dufour 40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.56 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Dufour 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Dufour 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 30.8% for the Dufour 40 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Dufour 40 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1995 Feeling 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Dufour 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Dufour 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Dufour 40 · 1995 Feeling 39