2008 Catalina 350 vs Hunter 280 — Comparison

2008 Catalina 350 2008 Catalina 350
VS
Hunter 280 Hunter 280

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2008 Catalina 350 Hunter 280
General
Manufacturer Catalina Hunter
Year 2008–2012 1998–2003
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Gerry Douglas Glenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam 3.65 m (12.0 ft) 2.82 m (9.3 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,577 kg (14,500 lbs) 2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)
Ballast 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) 998 kg (2,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 55.3 m² (595 ft²) 34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2008 Catalina 350
16.01
Hunter 280
18.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2008 Catalina 350
37.94
Hunter 280
38.61
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2008 Catalina 350
0.78
Hunter 280
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2008 Catalina 350
18.69
Hunter 280
16.46

Detailed Comparison

The 2008 Catalina 350 and Hunter 280 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2008 Catalina 350 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 280 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2008 Catalina 350 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 280 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 2008 Catalina 350 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the Hunter 280 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.82m beam. The 2008 Catalina 350 is 2.14m longer than the Hunter 280. The 2008 Catalina 350 displaces approximately 154% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2008 Catalina 350 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 55.3 m² of sail area. The Hunter 280, with an SA/D of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2008 Catalina 350 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Hunter 280 has a comfort ratio of 16.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 37.9% for the 2008 Catalina 350 and 38.6% for the Hunter 280, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2008 Catalina 350 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hunter 280 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2008 Catalina 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2008 Catalina 350 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS