2008 Najad 395 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

2008 Najad 395
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2008 Najad 3952003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerNajadSabre
Year2008–20152003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA12.10 m (39.7 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL10.30 m (33.8 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.80 m (12.5 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft2.00 m (6.6 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,000 kg (19,842 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area71.0 m² (764 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity350 L (92.5 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2008 Najad 395
16.67
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2008 Najad 395
38.89
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2008 Najad 395
0.73
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2008 Najad 395
19.88
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The 2008 Najad 395 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2008 Najad 395 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2008 Najad 395 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 2008 Najad 395 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 0.09m longer than the 2008 Najad 395. The 2008 Najad 395 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2008 Najad 395 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.67 and 71.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2008 Najad 395 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2008 Najad 395 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 2008 Najad 395 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2008 Najad 395 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 350L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2008 Najad 395 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2008 Najad 395 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Sabre 402 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2008 Najad 395 · 2003 Sabre 402