Hanse 375 vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison

Hanse 375
VS
1996 Moody 451996 Moody 45

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3751996 Moody 45
General
ManufacturerHanseMoody
Year2009–20151996–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUK
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA11.35 m (37.2 ft)13.72 m (45.0 ft)
LWL10.05 m (33.0 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)4.22 m (13.8 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,000 kg (15,432 lbs)12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)
Ballast2,150 kg (4,740 lbs)4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.0 m² (667 ft²)85.0 m² (915 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 375
17.21
1996 Moody 45
16.03
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 375
30.71
1996 Moody 45
39.20
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 375
0.76
1996 Moody 45
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 375
17.59
1996 Moody 45
19.06

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 375 and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 375 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The Hanse 375 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the Hanse 375 measures 11.35m (37.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 1996 Moody 45 is 2.37m longer than the Hanse 375. The 1996 Moody 45 displaces approximately 79% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 375 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.21 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 375 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 375 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 30.7% for the Hanse 375 and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 375 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Moody 45 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 375 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1996 Moody 45 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 375 · 1996 Moody 45