Hanse 375 vs Hunter 356 — Comparison

Hanse 375
VS
Hunter 356Hunter 356

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 375Hunter 356
General
ManufacturerHanseHunter
Year2009–20152000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA11.35 m (37.2 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL10.05 m (33.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.53 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,000 kg (15,432 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast2,150 kg (4,740 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.0 m² (667 ft²)53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 375
17.21
Hunter 356
17.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 375
30.71
Hunter 356
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 375
0.76
Hunter 356
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 375
17.59
Hunter 356
16.38

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 375 and Hunter 356 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 375 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 356 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The Hanse 375 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Hunter 356 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the Hanse 375 measures 11.35m (37.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the Hunter 356 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.53m beam. The Hanse 375 is 0.53m longer than the Hunter 356. The Hanse 375 displaces approximately 29% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 375 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.21 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 356, with an SA/D of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 356 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 375 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 356 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 30.7% for the Hanse 375 and 40.0% for the Hunter 356, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 375 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The Hunter 356 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 375 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 356 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 375 · Hunter 356