2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31 vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison

2010 Beneteau Oceanis 312010 Beneteau Oceanis 31
VS
1992 Moody 411992 Moody 41

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 Beneteau Oceanis 311992 Moody 41
General
ManufacturerBeneteauMoody
Year2010–20161992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUK
DesignerGroupe FinotBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA9.68 m (31.8 ft)12.50 m (41.0 ft)
LWL8.60 m (28.2 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.86 m (12.7 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,300 kg (9,480 lbs)9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Ballast1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.5 m² (490 ft²)70.0 m² (754 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)360 L (95.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31
17.48
1992 Moody 41
15.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31
32.56
1992 Moody 41
38.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31
0.81
1992 Moody 41
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31
17.05
1992 Moody 41
20.58

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31 and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31 measures 9.68m (31.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 is 2.82m longer than the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 128% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.48 and 45.5 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 32.6% for the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31 and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1992 Moody 41 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1992 Moody 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 31 · 1992 Moody 41