2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

2010 Beneteau Oceanis 432010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
VS
Hanse 342Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43Hanse 342
General
ManufacturerBeneteauHanse
Year2010–20142006–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceGermany
DesignerGroupe Finot-Conqjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA13.17 m (43.2 ft)10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL11.60 m (38.1 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam4.17 m (13.7 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,500 kg (20,944 lbs)5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area80.0 m² (861 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine54 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
18.12
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
31.58
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
0.79
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
14.95
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 was penned by Groupe Finot-Conq. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 measures 13.17m (43.2ft) overall with a beam of 4.17m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 is 2.87m longer than the Hanse 342. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 displaces approximately 79% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.12 and 80.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 31.6% for the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 342 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 · Hanse 342