2010 Elan 340 vs 1979 Cal 39 — Comparison

2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340
VS
1979 Cal 391979 Cal 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 Elan 3401979 Cal 39
General
ManufacturerElanCal
Year2010–20141979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySloveniaUSA
DesignerRob HumphreysBill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)11.89 m (39.0 ft)
LWL9.00 m (29.5 ft)9.60 m (31.5 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.0 m² (592 ft²)63.0 m² (678 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity160 L (42.3 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Elan 340
17.31
1979 Cal 39
15.78
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Elan 340
30.17
1979 Cal 39
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Elan 340
0.76
1979 Cal 39
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Elan 340
19.73
1979 Cal 39
21.05

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Elan 340 and 1979 Cal 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Elan 340 is a modern design by Elan from Slovenia, while the 1979 Cal 39 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 2010 Elan 340 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 1979 Cal 39 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 2010 Elan 340 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1979 Cal 39 at 11.89m (39.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1979 Cal 39 is 1.53m longer than the 2010 Elan 340. The 1979 Cal 39 displaces approximately 41% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Elan 340 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 Cal 39, with an SA/D of 15.78 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Elan 340 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1979 Cal 39 has a comfort ratio of 21.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340 and 41.7% for the 1979 Cal 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Elan 340 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1979 Cal 39 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Cal 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1979 Cal 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 Elan 340 · 1979 Cal 39