2010 Elan 340 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison
2010 Elan 340
2013 Elan 350
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2010 Elan 340 | 2013 Elan 350 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Elan | Elan |
| Year | 2010–2014 | 2013–2018 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Slovenia | Slovenia |
| Designer | Rob Humphreys | Rob Humphreys |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) | 10.67 m (35.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.00 m (29.5 ft) | 9.30 m (30.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 3.46 m (11.4 ft) |
| Draft | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) | 2.00 m (6.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) | 6,100 kg (13,448 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,750 kg (3,858 lbs) | 1,850 kg (4,079 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 55.0 m² (592 ft²) | 58.0 m² (624 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 80 L (21.1 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 160 L (42.3 gal) | 170 L (44.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2010 Elan 340 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Elan 340 is a modern design by Elan from Slovenia, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 2010 Elan 340 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.
In terms of size, the 2010 Elan 340 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2013 Elan 350 is 0.31m longer than the 2010 Elan 340. The 2013 Elan 350 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2010 Elan 340 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2010 Elan 340 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2010 Elan 340 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2010 Elan 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.