2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 vs 1988 Moody 36 — Comparison

2010 Hallberg-Rassy 402010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
VS
1988 Moody 361988 Moody 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 Hallberg-Rassy 401988 Moody 36
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyMoody
Year2010–20171988–1993
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUK
DesignerGerman FrersBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA12.08 m (39.6 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL10.40 m (34.1 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.82 m (12.5 ft)3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)
Ballast3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.0 m² (786 ft²)54.0 m² (581 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity380 L (100.4 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
16.89
1988 Moody 36
15.29
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
38.04
1988 Moody 36
39.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
0.73
1988 Moody 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
19.94
1988 Moody 36
20.90

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 and 1988 Moody 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is a modern design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1988 Moody 36 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 was penned by German Frers. The 1988 Moody 36 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 measures 12.08m (39.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.82m, compared to the 1988 Moody 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is 1.11m longer than the 1988 Moody 36. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Moody 36, with an SA/D of 15.29 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1988 Moody 36 has a comfort ratio of 20.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 38.0% for the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 and 39.7% for the 1988 Moody 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 380L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1988 Moody 36 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Moody 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Moody 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 · 1988 Moody 36