2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 vs 1984 Ericson 38 — Comparison

2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
VS
1984 Ericson 381984 Ericson 38

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 X-Yachts Xc 351984 Ericson 38
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsEricson
Year2010–20161984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkUSA
DesignerNiels JeppesenBruce King / Ron Holland
Dimensions
LOA10.57 m (34.7 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)60.0 m² (646 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity70 L (18.5 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
16.37
1984 Ericson 38
15.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
36.21
1984 Ericson 38
42.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
0.75
1984 Ericson 38
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
19.28
1984 Ericson 38
20.06

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 1984 Ericson 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 1984 Ericson 38 is a 1980s offering from Ericson from USA. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 1984 Ericson 38 was designed by Bruce King / Ron Holland.

In terms of size, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 measures 10.57m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1984 Ericson 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1984 Ericson 38 is 1.01m longer than the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35. The 1984 Ericson 38 displaces approximately 29% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.37 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Ericson 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1984 Ericson 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 42.4% for the 1984 Ericson 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 70L of fuel. The 1984 Ericson 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Ericson 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Ericson 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 · 1984 Ericson 38