2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 vs 1991 Westerly Seahawk — Comparison

2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
VS
1991 Westerly Seahawk1991 Westerly Seahawk

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 X-Yachts Xc 351991 Westerly Seahawk
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsWesterly
Year2010–20161991–1997
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkUK
DesignerNiels JeppesenEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA10.57 m (34.7 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity70 L (18.5 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)220 L (58.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
16.37
1991 Westerly Seahawk
14.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
36.21
1991 Westerly Seahawk
40.75
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
0.75
1991 Westerly Seahawk
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
19.28
1991 Westerly Seahawk
22.81

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 1991 Westerly Seahawk represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 1991 Westerly Seahawk is a 1990s offering from Westerly from UK. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 measures 10.57m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1991 Westerly Seahawk at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is 0.21m longer than the 1991 Westerly Seahawk. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.37 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk, with an SA/D of 14.57 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1991 Westerly Seahawk has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 40.8% for the 1991 Westerly Seahawk, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 70L of fuel. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 220L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 · 1991 Westerly Seahawk