2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 X-Yachts Xc 352013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsBeneteau
Year2010–20162013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkFrance
DesignerNiels JeppesenVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA10.57 m (34.7 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity70 L (18.5 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths62
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
16.37
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
36.21
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
0.75
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
19.28
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 measures 10.57m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is 0.47m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 displaces approximately 68% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.37 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 70L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3