2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 X-Yachts Xc 352013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsElan
Year2010–20162013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkSlovenia
DesignerNiels JeppesenRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA10.57 m (34.7 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity70 L (18.5 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
16.37
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
36.21
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
0.75
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
19.28
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 measures 10.57m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2013 Elan 350 is 0.10m longer than the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35. The 2013 Elan 350 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.37 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 70L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 · 2013 Elan 350