2011 J/111 vs 1988 Moody 36 — Comparison

2011 J/111 2011 J/111
VS
1988 Moody 36 1988 Moody 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2011 J/111 1988 Moody 36
General
Manufacturer J/Boats Moody
Year 2011 1988–1993
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA UK
Designer Alan Johnstone Bill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA 11.13 m (36.5 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam 3.40 m (11.2 ft) 3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft 2.20 m (7.2 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs) 6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)
Ballast 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) 2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 71.0 m² (764 ft²) 54.0 m² (581 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2011 J/111
24.71
1988 Moody 36
15.29
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2011 J/111
40.90
1988 Moody 36
39.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2011 J/111
0.80
1988 Moody 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2011 J/111
14.54
1988 Moody 36
20.90

Detailed Comparison

The 2011 J/111 and 1988 Moody 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2011 J/111 is a modern design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1988 Moody 36 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 2011 J/111 was penned by Alan Johnstone. The 1988 Moody 36 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2011 J/111 measures 11.13m (36.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1988 Moody 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 2011 J/111 is 0.16m longer than the 1988 Moody 36. The 1988 Moody 36 displaces approximately 36% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2011 J/111 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 24.71 and 71.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Moody 36, with an SA/D of 15.29 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2011 J/111 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2011 J/111 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1988 Moody 36 has a comfort ratio of 20.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 2011 J/111 and 39.7% for the 1988 Moody 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2011 J/111 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1988 Moody 36 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Moody 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2011 J/111 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Moody 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS