2012 Hanse 385 vs Hunter 30 — Comparison

2012 Hanse 385 2012 Hanse 385
VS
Hunter 30 Hunter 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2012 Hanse 385 Hunter 30
General
Manufacturer Hanse Hunter
Year 2012–2016 1991–1996
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer Judel/Vrolijk Hunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA 11.40 m (37.4 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL 10.15 m (33.3 ft) 7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam 3.88 m (12.7 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 2.00 m (6.6 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,300 kg (16,094 lbs) 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast 2,200 kg (4,850 lbs) 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 67.0 m² (721 ft²) 41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 30 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 80 L (21.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 170 L (44.9 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 6
Cabins 3 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 Hanse 385
18.09
Hunter 30
16.94
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 Hanse 385
30.14
Hunter 30
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 Hanse 385
0.80
Hunter 30
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 Hanse 385
16.64
Hunter 30
19.54

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 Hanse 385 and Hunter 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 Hanse 385 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 30 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2012 Hanse 385 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The Hunter 30 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 2012 Hanse 385 measures 11.40m (37.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.88m, compared to the Hunter 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 2012 Hanse 385 is 2.26m longer than the Hunter 30. The 2012 Hanse 385 displaces approximately 89% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 Hanse 385 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.09 and 67.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 30, with an SA/D of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2012 Hanse 385 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 Hanse 385 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 30.1% for the 2012 Hanse 385 and 41.2% for the Hunter 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 Hanse 385 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The Hunter 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Hanse 385 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 Hanse 385 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS