2012 Sabre 48 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

2012 Sabre 482012 Sabre 48
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2012 Sabre 481995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerSabreFeeling
Year20121995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerJim TaylorPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA14.63 m (48.0 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL12.50 m (41.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam4.30 m (14.1 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement13,608 kg (30,000 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area96.0 m² (1,033 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine100 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity284 L (75.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity454 L (119.9 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 Sabre 48
17.11
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 Sabre 48
38.33
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 Sabre 48
0.72
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 Sabre 48
17.35
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 Sabre 48 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 Sabre 48 is a modern design by Sabre from USA, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 2012 Sabre 48 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 2012 Sabre 48 measures 14.63m (48.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.30m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 2012 Sabre 48 is 2.83m longer than the 1995 Feeling 39. The 2012 Sabre 48 displaces approximately 74% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 Sabre 48 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.11 and 96.0 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 Sabre 48 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 Sabre 48 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.3% for the 2012 Sabre 48 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 Sabre 48 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 454L of water capacity and 284L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1995 Feeling 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Sabre 48 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2012 Sabre 48 · 1995 Feeling 39