2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 vs 1984 Ericson 38 — Comparison

2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
VS
1984 Ericson 381984 Ericson 38

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2012 X-Yachts Xc 421984 Ericson 38
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsEricson
Year2012–20181984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkUSA
DesignerNiels JeppesenBruce King / Ron Holland
Dimensions
LOA12.73 m (41.8 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL10.90 m (35.8 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.93 m (12.9 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast3,600 kg (7,937 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area79.0 m² (850 ft²)60.0 m² (646 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
17.52
1984 Ericson 38
15.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
36.73
1984 Ericson 38
42.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
0.74
1984 Ericson 38
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
18.55
1984 Ericson 38
20.06

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 and 1984 Ericson 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 1984 Ericson 38 is a 1980s offering from Ericson from USA. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 1984 Ericson 38 was designed by Bruce King / Ron Holland.

In terms of size, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 measures 12.73m (41.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.93m, compared to the 1984 Ericson 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is 1.15m longer than the 1984 Ericson 38. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 displaces approximately 31% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.52 and 79.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Ericson 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1984 Ericson 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 36.7% for the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 and 42.4% for the 1984 Ericson 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1984 Ericson 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Ericson 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 · 1984 Ericson 38