2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 vs 2014 Elan 400 — Comparison

2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
VS
2014 Elan 4002014 Elan 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2012 X-Yachts Xc 422014 Elan 400
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsElan
Year2012–20182014–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkSlovenia
DesignerNiels JeppesenRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA12.73 m (41.8 ft)12.07 m (39.6 ft)
LWL10.90 m (35.8 ft)10.50 m (34.4 ft)
Beam3.93 m (12.9 ft)3.90 m (12.8 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)
Ballast3,600 kg (7,937 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area79.0 m² (850 ft²)76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
17.52
2014 Elan 400
18.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
36.73
2014 Elan 400
31.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
0.74
2014 Elan 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 X-Yachts Xc 42
18.55
2014 Elan 400
17.08

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 and 2014 Elan 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 2014 Elan 400 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 2014 Elan 400 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 measures 12.73m (41.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.93m, compared to the 2014 Elan 400 at 12.07m (39.6ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is 0.66m longer than the 2014 Elan 400. The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.52 and 79.0 m² of sail area. The 2014 Elan 400, with an SA/D of 18.99 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2014 Elan 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2014 Elan 400 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 36.7% for the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 and 31.7% for the 2014 Elan 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 2014 Elan 400 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2014 Elan 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2012 X-Yachts Xc 42 · 2014 Elan 400