2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

2012 X-Yachts Xp 44
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2012 X-Yachts Xp 441984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsPearson
Year2012–20201984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkUSA
DesignerNiels JeppesenWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA13.29 m (43.6 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL11.70 m (38.4 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam4.02 m (13.2 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft2.45 m (8.0 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast3,700 kg (8,157 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area90.0 m² (969 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity270 L (71.3 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 X-Yachts Xp 44
19.96
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 X-Yachts Xp 44
37.76
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 X-Yachts Xp 44
0.75
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 X-Yachts Xp 44
15.91
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 measures 13.29m (43.6ft) overall with a beam of 4.02m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 is 2.93m longer than the 1984 Pearson 34. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 19.96 and 90.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 37.8% for the 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 270L of water capacity and 140L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Pearson 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 · 1984 Pearson 34