2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

2012 X-Yachts Xp 44
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2012 X-Yachts Xp 442013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsElan
Year2012–20202013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkSlovenia
DesignerNiels JeppesenRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA13.29 m (43.6 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL11.70 m (38.4 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam4.02 m (13.2 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft2.45 m (8.0 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast3,700 kg (8,157 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area90.0 m² (969 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity270 L (71.3 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 X-Yachts Xp 44
19.96
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 X-Yachts Xp 44
37.76
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 X-Yachts Xp 44
0.75
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 X-Yachts Xp 44
15.91
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 measures 13.29m (43.6ft) overall with a beam of 4.02m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 is 2.62m longer than the 2013 Elan 350. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 displaces approximately 61% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 19.96 and 90.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 37.8% for the 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 270L of water capacity and 140L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2013 Elan 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2012 X-Yachts Xp 44 · 2013 Elan 350