2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 vs 1979 Pearson 37 — Comparison

2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
VS
1979 Pearson 37 1979 Pearson 37

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 1979 Pearson 37
General
Manufacturer Beneteau Pearson
Year 2013 1979–1985
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France USA
Designer VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost William Shaw
Dimensions
LOA 10.10 m (33.1 ft) 11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 8.69 m (28.5 ft)
Beam 3.40 m (11.2 ft) 3.43 m (11.3 ft)
Draft 2.10 m (6.9 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,450 kg (7,606 lbs) 7,258 kg (16,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,500 kg (3,307 lbs) 3,084 kg (6,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 65.0 m² (700 ft²) 56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 20 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 60 L (15.9 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity 40 L (10.6 gal) 190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 2 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
1979 Pearson 37
15.18
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
1979 Pearson 37
42.49
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
1979 Pearson 37
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16
1979 Pearson 37
24.10

Detailed Comparison

The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 and 1979 Pearson 37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 1979 Pearson 37 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was penned by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost. The 1979 Pearson 37 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 measures 10.10m (33.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1979 Pearson 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.43m beam. The 1979 Pearson 37 is 1.18m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The 1979 Pearson 37 displaces approximately 110% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 Pearson 37, with an SA/D of 15.18 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 11.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.90). The 1979 Pearson 37 has a comfort ratio of 24.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 and 42.5% for the 1979 Pearson 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 provides 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1979 Pearson 37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Pearson 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1979 Pearson 37 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS