2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
1983 Pearson 31
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 | 1983 Pearson 31 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Beneteau | Pearson |
| Year | 2013 | 1983–1990 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | France | USA |
| Designer | VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost | William Shaw |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.10 m (33.1 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) | 7.77 m (25.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 3.10 m (10.2 ft) |
| Draft | 2.10 m (6.9 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,450 kg (7,606 lbs) | 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,500 kg (3,307 lbs) | 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 65.0 m² (700 ft²) | 40.0 m² (431 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 20 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L (15.9 gal) | 68 L (18.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 40 L (10.6 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 2 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was penned by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.
In terms of size, the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 measures 10.10m (33.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is 0.65m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The 1983 Pearson 31 displaces approximately 25% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 11.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.90). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 provides 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1983 Pearson 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 · 1983 Pearson 31