2015 ClubSwan 36 vs 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2015 ClubSwan 36 | 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Nautor Swan | Pacific Seacraft |
| Year | 2015 | 1982–2005 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Finland | USA |
| Designer | Juan Kouyoumdjian | William Crealock |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.00 m (36.1 ft) | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.90 m (32.5 ft) | 6.55 m (21.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.30 m (10.8 ft) | 2.64 m (8.7 ft) |
| Draft | 2.30 m (7.5 ft) | 1.14 m (3.7 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,800 kg (10,582 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 65.0 m² (700 ft²) | 30.5 m² (328 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Full |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 40 L (10.6 gal) | 45 L (11.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 60 L (15.9 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 4 |
| Cabins | 1 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2015 ClubSwan 36 and 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 is a modern design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 was penned by Juan Kouyoumdjian. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was designed by William Crealock.
In terms of size, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 measures 11.00m (36.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.30m, compared to the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.64m beam. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 is 2.77m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 displaces approximately 51% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.21 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, with an SA/D of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has a comfort ratio of 26.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 35.4% for the 2015 ClubSwan 36 and 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 60L of water capacity and 40L of fuel. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2015 ClubSwan 36 · 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27