2015 ClubSwan 36 vs 1987 Cape Dory 40 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2015 ClubSwan 36 | 1987 Cape Dory 40 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Nautor Swan | Cape Dory |
| Year | 2015 | 1987–1992 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Finland | USA |
| Designer | Juan Kouyoumdjian | Carl Alberg |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.00 m (36.1 ft) | 12.19 m (40.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.90 m (32.5 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.30 m (10.8 ft) | 3.66 m (12.0 ft) |
| Draft | 2.30 m (7.5 ft) | 1.68 m (5.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,800 kg (10,582 lbs) | 8,618 kg (18,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) | 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 65.0 m² (700 ft²) | 64.5 m² (694 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Full |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 40 L (10.6 gal) | 151 L (39.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 60 L (15.9 gal) | 284 L (75.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 7 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2015 ClubSwan 36 and 1987 Cape Dory 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 is a modern design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1987 Cape Dory 40 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 was penned by Juan Kouyoumdjian. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 was designed by Carl Alberg.
In terms of size, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 measures 11.00m (36.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.30m, compared to the 1987 Cape Dory 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is 1.19m longer than the 2015 ClubSwan 36. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.21 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 1987 Cape Dory 40, with an SA/D of 15.59 and 64.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has a comfort ratio of 22.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 35.4% for the 2015 ClubSwan 36 and 42.1% for the 1987 Cape Dory 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 60L of water capacity and 40L of fuel. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 284L water and 151L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2015 ClubSwan 36 · 1987 Cape Dory 40