2015 ClubSwan 36 vs 1998 Feeling 44 — Comparison

2015 ClubSwan 36
VS
1998 Feeling 44

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2015 ClubSwan 361998 Feeling 44
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanFeeling
Year20151998–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandFrance
DesignerJuan KouyoumdjianPhilippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios
Dimensions
LOA11.00 m (36.1 ft)13.41 m (44.0 ft)
LWL9.90 m (32.5 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam3.30 m (10.8 ft)4.10 m (13.5 ft)
Draft2.30 m (7.5 ft)1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,800 kg (10,582 lbs)10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)4,000 kg (8,818 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area65.0 m² (700 ft²)82.0 m² (883 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity40 L (10.6 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)400 L (105.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths48
Cabins13

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2015 ClubSwan 36
23.21
1998 Feeling 44
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2015 ClubSwan 36
35.42
1998 Feeling 44
38.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2015 ClubSwan 36
0.78
1998 Feeling 44
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2015 ClubSwan 36
14.37
1998 Feeling 44
16.90

Detailed Comparison

The 2015 ClubSwan 36 and 1998 Feeling 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 is a modern design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1998 Feeling 44 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 was penned by Juan Kouyoumdjian. The 1998 Feeling 44 was designed by Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios.

In terms of size, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 measures 11.00m (36.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.30m, compared to the 1998 Feeling 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.10m beam. The 1998 Feeling 44 is 2.41m longer than the 2015 ClubSwan 36. The 1998 Feeling 44 displaces approximately 119% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.21 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 1998 Feeling 44, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 82.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1998 Feeling 44 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 35.4% for the 2015 ClubSwan 36 and 38.1% for the 1998 Feeling 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 60L of water capacity and 40L of fuel. The 1998 Feeling 44 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 Feeling 44 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Feeling 44 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2015 ClubSwan 36 · 1998 Feeling 44