2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

2015 X-Yachts Xc 38
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2015 X-Yachts Xc 381984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsPearson
Year2015–20201984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkUSA
DesignerNiels JeppesenWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL10.15 m (33.3 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.64 m (11.9 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft2.05 m (6.7 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast2,800 kg (6,173 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area66.0 m² (710 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine30 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2015 X-Yachts Xc 38
17.05
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2015 X-Yachts Xc 38
35.90
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2015 X-Yachts Xc 38
0.74
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2015 X-Yachts Xc 38
19.16
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The 2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.64m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 is 1.22m longer than the 1984 Pearson 34. The 2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 35.9% for the 2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Pearson 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2015 X-Yachts Xc 38 · 1984 Pearson 34