Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

Beneteau Oceanis 34.1
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBeneteau Oceanis 34.11982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerBeneteauWesterly
Year20161982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUK
DesignerMarc LombardEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA10.34 m (33.9 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL9.35 m (30.7 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.39 m (11.1 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,600 kg (3,527 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Beneteau Oceanis 34.1
17.60
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Beneteau Oceanis 34.1
30.77
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Beneteau Oceanis 34.1
0.78
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Beneteau Oceanis 34.1
16.89
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 was penned by Marc Lombard. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 measures 10.34m (33.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.39m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 is 0.84m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 displaces approximately 15% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.60 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 30.8% for the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Beneteau Oceanis 34.1 · 1982 Westerly Konsort