2016 Dehler 36 SQ vs 2000 Najad 355 — Comparison

2016 Dehler 36 SQ
VS
2000 Najad 355

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2016 Dehler 36 SQ2000 Najad 355
General
ManufacturerDehlerNajad
Year20162000–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanySweden
DesignerJudel/VrolijkJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.85 m (35.6 ft)10.72 m (35.2 ft)
LWL9.85 m (32.3 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.38 m (11.1 ft)
Draft2.00 m (6.6 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,500 kg (12,125 lbs)6,000 kg (13,228 lbs)
Ballast1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.0 m² (614 ft²)51.0 m² (549 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity55 L (14.5 gal)110 L (29.1 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2016 Dehler 36 SQ
18.59
2000 Najad 355
15.69
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2016 Dehler 36 SQ
32.73
2000 Najad 355
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2016 Dehler 36 SQ
0.77
2000 Najad 355
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2016 Dehler 36 SQ
16.07
2000 Najad 355
20.10

Detailed Comparison

The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ and 2000 Najad 355 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ is a modern design by Dehler from Germany, while the 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2000 Najad 355 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 2016 Dehler 36 SQ measures 10.85m (35.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 2000 Najad 355 at 10.72m (35.2ft) with a 3.38m beam. The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ is 0.13m longer than the 2000 Najad 355. The 2000 Najad 355 displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2016 Dehler 36 SQ has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.59 and 57.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Najad 355, with an SA/D of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2016 Dehler 36 SQ offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2000 Najad 355 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 32.7% for the 2016 Dehler 36 SQ and 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2016 Dehler 36 SQ provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 55L of fuel. The 2000 Najad 355 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 110L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Najad 355 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2016 Dehler 36 SQ · 2000 Najad 355