2016 Dehler 36 SQ vs 2002 Najad 440 — Comparison

2016 Dehler 36 SQ
VS
2002 Najad 440

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2016 Dehler 36 SQ2002 Najad 440
General
ManufacturerDehlerNajad
Year20162002–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanySweden
DesignerJudel/VrolijkJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.85 m (35.6 ft)13.50 m (44.3 ft)
LWL9.85 m (32.3 ft)11.20 m (36.7 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)4.10 m (13.5 ft)
Draft2.00 m (6.6 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,500 kg (12,125 lbs)11,500 kg (25,353 lbs)
Ballast1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.0 m² (614 ft²)88.0 m² (947 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity55 L (14.5 gal)280 L (74.0 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)480 L (126.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2016 Dehler 36 SQ
18.59
2002 Najad 440
17.55
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2016 Dehler 36 SQ
32.73
2002 Najad 440
39.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2016 Dehler 36 SQ
0.77
2002 Najad 440
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2016 Dehler 36 SQ
16.07
2002 Najad 440
19.08

Detailed Comparison

The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ and 2002 Najad 440 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ is a modern design by Dehler from Germany, while the 2002 Najad 440 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2002 Najad 440 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 2016 Dehler 36 SQ measures 10.85m (35.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 2002 Najad 440 at 13.50m (44.3ft) with a 4.10m beam. The 2002 Najad 440 is 2.65m longer than the 2016 Dehler 36 SQ. The 2002 Najad 440 displaces approximately 109% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2016 Dehler 36 SQ has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.59 and 57.0 m² of sail area. The 2002 Najad 440, with an SA/D of 17.55 and 88.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2016 Dehler 36 SQ offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2002 Najad 440 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 32.7% for the 2016 Dehler 36 SQ and 39.1% for the 2002 Najad 440, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2016 Dehler 36 SQ provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 55L of fuel. The 2002 Najad 440 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 480L water and 280L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2002 Najad 440 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2016 Dehler 36 SQ has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2002 Najad 440 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2016 Dehler 36 SQ · 2002 Najad 440