Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

Beneteau Oceanis 38.1Beneteau Oceanis 38.1
VS
2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBeneteau Oceanis 38.12000 Sabre 386
General
ManufacturerBeneteauSabre
Year20172000–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerMarc LombardJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA11.50 m (37.7 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL10.47 m (34.4 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft2.08 m (6.8 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,150 kg (15,763 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast2,200 kg (4,850 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.5 m² (673 ft²)60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Beneteau Oceanis 38.1
17.11
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Beneteau Oceanis 38.1
30.77
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Beneteau Oceanis 38.1
0.77
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Beneteau Oceanis 38.1
16.43
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 was penned by Marc Lombard. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 measures 11.50m (37.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2000 Sabre 386 is 0.08m longer than the Beneteau Oceanis 38.1. The 2000 Sabre 386 displaces approximately 1% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.11 and 62.5 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.8% for the Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 140L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Sabre 386 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Beneteau Oceanis 38.1 · 2000 Sabre 386