Hanse 388 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

Hanse 388
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3881983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerHanseIrwin
Year20171983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA11.40 m (37.4 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL10.34 m (33.9 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.73 m (12.2 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,200 kg (15,873 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,200 kg (4,850 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area63.0 m² (678 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity260 L (68.7 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 388
17.17
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 388
30.56
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 388
0.77
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 388
16.86
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 388 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 388 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The Hanse 388 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the Hanse 388 measures 11.40m (37.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.73m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The Hanse 388 is 1.65m longer than the 1983 Irwin 32. The Hanse 388 displaces approximately 44% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 388 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.17 and 63.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hanse 388 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 388 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 30.6% for the Hanse 388 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 388 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 140L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 388 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 388 · 1983 Irwin 32