Hanse 388 vs Hunter 30 — Comparison

Hanse 388 Hanse 388
VS
Hunter 30 Hunter 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hanse 388 Hunter 30
General
Manufacturer Hanse Hunter
Year 2017 1991–1996
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer judel/vrolijk & co Hunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA 11.40 m (37.4 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL 10.34 m (33.9 ft) 7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam 3.73 m (12.2 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 2.10 m (6.9 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,200 kg (15,873 lbs) 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast 2,200 kg (4,850 lbs) 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 63.0 m² (678 ft²) 41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 29 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 140 L (37.0 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 260 L (68.7 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 388
17.17
Hunter 30
16.94
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 388
30.56
Hunter 30
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 388
0.77
Hunter 30
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 388
16.86
Hunter 30
19.54

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 388 and Hunter 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 388 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 30 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The Hanse 388 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Hunter 30 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the Hanse 388 measures 11.40m (37.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.73m, compared to the Hunter 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The Hanse 388 is 2.26m longer than the Hunter 30. The Hanse 388 displaces approximately 87% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 388 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.17 and 63.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 30, with an SA/D of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 388 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 388 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hunter 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 30.6% for the Hanse 388 and 41.2% for the Hunter 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 388 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 140L of fuel. The Hunter 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 388 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS