Hanse 388 vs Hunter 450 — Comparison

Hanse 388
VS
Hunter 450

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 388Hunter 450
General
ManufacturerHanseHunter
Year20172001–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA11.40 m (37.4 ft)13.72 m (45.0 ft)
LWL10.34 m (33.9 ft)11.89 m (39.0 ft)
Beam3.73 m (12.2 ft)4.27 m (14.0 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)2.06 m (6.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,200 kg (15,873 lbs)10,886 kg (23,999 lbs)
Ballast2,200 kg (4,850 lbs)4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area63.0 m² (678 ft²)86.0 m² (926 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Water Capacity260 L (68.7 gal)341 L (90.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 388
17.17
Hunter 450
17.79
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 388
30.56
Hunter 450
37.50
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 388
0.77
Hunter 450
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 388
16.86
Hunter 450
15.63

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 388 and Hunter 450 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 388 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 450 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The Hanse 388 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Hunter 450 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the Hanse 388 measures 11.40m (37.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.73m, compared to the Hunter 450 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.27m beam. The Hunter 450 is 2.32m longer than the Hanse 388. The Hunter 450 displaces approximately 51% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 388 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.17 and 63.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 450, with an SA/D of 17.79 and 86.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 450 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 388 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hunter 450 has a comfort ratio of 15.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 30.6% for the Hanse 388 and 37.5% for the Hunter 450, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 388 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 140L of fuel. The Hunter 450 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 341L water and 189L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 388 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 450 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 450 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 388 · Hunter 450