Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 vs 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F — Comparison

Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
VS
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationJeanneau Sun Odyssey 3891986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
General
ManufacturerJeanneauHallberg-Rassy
Year20191986–1995
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceSweden
DesignerMarc LombardGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA11.75 m (38.5 ft)12.80 m (42.0 ft)
LWL10.40 m (34.1 ft)10.20 m (33.5 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.90 m (12.8 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Ballast2,300 kg (5,071 lbs)4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area64.0 m² (689 ft²)78.0 m² (840 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity160 L (42.3 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity280 L (74.0 gal)400 L (105.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
16.82
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
16.52
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
30.26
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
0.77
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
17.14
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
21.84

Detailed Comparison

The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 and 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 is a modern design by Jeanneau from France, while the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F is a 1980s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 was penned by Marc Lombard. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 measures 11.75m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F at 12.80m (42.0ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F is 1.05m longer than the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.82 and 64.0 m² of sail area. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F, with an SA/D of 16.52 and 78.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F has a comfort ratio of 21.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 30.3% for the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 and 40.0% for the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 · 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F