Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison

Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
VS
1996 Moody 451996 Moody 45

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationJeanneau Sun Odyssey 3891996 Moody 45
General
ManufacturerJeanneauMoody
Year20191996–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUK
DesignerMarc LombardBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA11.75 m (38.5 ft)13.72 m (45.0 ft)
LWL10.40 m (34.1 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)4.22 m (13.8 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)
Ballast2,300 kg (5,071 lbs)4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area64.0 m² (689 ft²)85.0 m² (915 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity160 L (42.3 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity280 L (74.0 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
16.82
1996 Moody 45
16.03
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
30.26
1996 Moody 45
39.20
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
0.77
1996 Moody 45
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
17.14
1996 Moody 45
19.06

Detailed Comparison

The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 is a modern design by Jeanneau from France, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 was penned by Marc Lombard. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 measures 11.75m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 1996 Moody 45 is 1.97m longer than the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389. The 1996 Moody 45 displaces approximately 64% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.82 and 64.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 30.3% for the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Moody 45 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1996 Moody 45 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 · 1996 Moody 45