Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison

Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
VS
1996 Najad 380 1996 Najad 380

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 1996 Najad 380
General
Manufacturer Jeanneau Najad
Year 2019 1996–2006
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France Sweden
Designer Marc Lombard Judel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA 11.75 m (38.5 ft) 11.55 m (37.9 ft)
LWL 10.40 m (34.1 ft) 9.50 m (31.2 ft)
Beam 3.76 m (12.3 ft) 3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft 1.90 m (6.2 ft) 1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,600 kg (16,755 lbs) 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Ballast 2,300 kg (5,071 lbs) 3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 64.0 m² (689 ft²) 62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 29 HP 40 HP
Fuel Capacity 160 L (42.3 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity 280 L (74.0 gal) 260 L (68.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
16.82
1996 Najad 380
16.44
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
30.26
1996 Najad 380
40.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
0.77
1996 Najad 380
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
17.14
1996 Najad 380
20.83

Detailed Comparison

The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 is a modern design by Jeanneau from France, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 was penned by Marc Lombard. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 measures 11.75m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 is 0.20m longer than the 1996 Najad 380. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 displaces approximately 1% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.82 and 64.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 30.3% for the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS