1963 Cal 40 vs 1979 Westerly Fulmar — Comparison

1963 Cal 401963 Cal 40
VS
1979 Westerly Fulmar1979 Westerly Fulmar

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1963 Cal 401979 Westerly Fulmar
General
ManufacturerCalWesterly
Year1963–19721979–1986
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerBill LapworthEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.00 m (26.2 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,030 kg (15,498 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.3 m² (660 ft²)36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)136 L (35.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1963 Cal 40
16.97
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1963 Cal 40
38.72
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1963 Cal 40
0.70
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1963 Cal 40
21.35
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41

Detailed Comparison

The 1963 Cal 40 and 1979 Westerly Fulmar represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Cal 40 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1963 Cal 40 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1963 Cal 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1979 Westerly Fulmar at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1963 Cal 40 is 2.44m longer than the 1979 Westerly Fulmar. The 1963 Cal 40 displaces approximately 41% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1963 Cal 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 61.3 m² of sail area. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar, with an SA/D of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1963 Cal 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1963 Cal 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1979 Westerly Fulmar has a comfort ratio of 22.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the 1963 Cal 40 and 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1963 Cal 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1963 Cal 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1963 Cal 40 · 1979 Westerly Fulmar