1979 Westerly Fulmar vs 2014 Elan 400 — Comparison

1979 Westerly Fulmar1979 Westerly Fulmar
VS
2014 Elan 4002014 Elan 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1979 Westerly Fulmar2014 Elan 400
General
ManufacturerWesterlyElan
Year1979–19862014–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKSlovenia
DesignerEd DuboisRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)12.07 m (39.6 ft)
LWL8.00 m (26.2 ft)10.50 m (34.4 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.90 m (12.8 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area36.0 m² (388 ft²)76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity136 L (35.9 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
2014 Elan 400
18.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
2014 Elan 400
31.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
2014 Elan 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41
2014 Elan 400
17.08

Detailed Comparison

The 1979 Westerly Fulmar and 2014 Elan 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s design by Westerly from UK, while the 2014 Elan 400 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was penned by Ed Dubois. The 2014 Elan 400 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 2014 Elan 400 at 12.07m (39.6ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 2014 Elan 400 is 2.32m longer than the 1979 Westerly Fulmar. The 2014 Elan 400 displaces approximately 64% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The 2014 Elan 400, with an SA/D of 18.99 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2014 Elan 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2014 Elan 400 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar and 31.7% for the 2014 Elan 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 2014 Elan 400 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2014 Elan 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2014 Elan 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1979 Westerly Fulmar · 2014 Elan 400