1963 Cal 40 vs 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 — Comparison

1963 Cal 401963 Cal 40
VS
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321990 Wauquiez Centurion 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1963 Cal 401990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
General
ManufacturerCalWauquiez
Year1963–19721990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerBill LapworthJean-Marie Finot
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,030 kg (15,498 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.3 m² (660 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)65 L (17.2 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1963 Cal 40
16.97
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1963 Cal 40
38.72
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1963 Cal 40
0.70
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1963 Cal 40
21.35
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88

Detailed Comparison

The 1963 Cal 40 and 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Cal 40 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s offering from Wauquiez from France. The 1963 Cal 40 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was designed by Jean-Marie Finot.

In terms of size, the 1963 Cal 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1963 Cal 40 is 2.44m longer than the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32. The 1963 Cal 40 displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1963 Cal 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 61.3 m² of sail area. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1963 Cal 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1963 Cal 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the 1963 Cal 40 and 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1963 Cal 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 65L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1963 Cal 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1963 Cal 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1963 Cal 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1963 Cal 40 · 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32