2003 Sabre 402 vs 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 — Comparison

2003 Sabre 402
VS
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321990 Wauquiez Centurion 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2003 Sabre 4021990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
General
ManufacturerSabreWauquiez
Year2003–20101990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerJim TaylorJean-Marie Finot
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area66.0 m² (710 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)65 L (17.2 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths75
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Sabre 402
18.32
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Sabre 402 and 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s offering from Wauquiez from France. The 2003 Sabre 402 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was designed by Jean-Marie Finot.

In terms of size, the 2003 Sabre 402 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 2.44m longer than the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 81% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Sabre 402 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Sabre 402 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402 and 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Sabre 402 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 65L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Sabre 402 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2003 Sabre 402 · 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32