1963 Cal 40 vs Bavaria 40 — Comparison

1963 Cal 401963 Cal 40
VS
Bavaria 40Bavaria 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1963 Cal 40Bavaria 40
General
ManufacturerCalBavaria
Year1963–19722001–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerBill LapworthJ&J Design
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)12.35 m (40.5 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)10.75 m (35.3 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.99 m (13.1 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,030 kg (15,498 lbs)8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.3 m² (660 ft²)72.0 m² (775 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)300 L (79.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1963 Cal 40
16.97
Bavaria 40
17.56
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1963 Cal 40
38.72
Bavaria 40
30.59
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1963 Cal 40
0.70
Bavaria 40
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1963 Cal 40
21.35
Bavaria 40
16.39

Detailed Comparison

The 1963 Cal 40 and Bavaria 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Cal 40 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the Bavaria 40 is a 2000s offering from Bavaria from Germany. The 1963 Cal 40 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The Bavaria 40 was designed by J&J Design.

In terms of size, the 1963 Cal 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the Bavaria 40 at 12.35m (40.5ft) with a 3.99m beam. The Bavaria 40 is 0.16m longer than the 1963 Cal 40. The Bavaria 40 displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1963 Cal 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 61.3 m² of sail area. The Bavaria 40, with an SA/D of 17.56 and 72.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1963 Cal 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Bavaria 40 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the 1963 Cal 40 and 30.6% for the Bavaria 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1963 Cal 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Bavaria 40 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L water and 160L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1963 Cal 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1963 Cal 40 · Bavaria 40