1963 Cal 40 vs 2017 Dehler 46 — Comparison
1963 Cal 40
2017 Dehler 46
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1963 Cal 40 | 2017 Dehler 46 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Cal | Dehler |
| Year | 1963–1972 | 2017 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Germany |
| Designer | Bill Lapworth | Judel/Vrolijk |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.19 m (40.0 ft) | 14.10 m (46.3 ft) |
| LWL | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) | 12.80 m (42.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) | 4.20 m (13.8 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 2.30 m (7.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,030 kg (15,498 lbs) | 10,500 kg (23,149 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) | 3,500 kg (7,716 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 61.3 m² (660 ft²) | 96.0 m² (1,033 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 22 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 130 L (34.3 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 250 L (66.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 8 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1963 Cal 40 and 2017 Dehler 46 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Cal 40 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the 2017 Dehler 46 is a modern offering from Dehler from Germany. The 1963 Cal 40 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The 2017 Dehler 46 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.
In terms of size, the 1963 Cal 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2017 Dehler 46 at 14.10m (46.3ft) with a 4.20m beam. The 2017 Dehler 46 is 1.91m longer than the 1963 Cal 40. The 2017 Dehler 46 displaces approximately 49% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1963 Cal 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 61.3 m² of sail area. The 2017 Dehler 46, with an SA/D of 20.34 and 96.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2017 Dehler 46 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1963 Cal 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 2017 Dehler 46 has a comfort ratio of 13.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the 1963 Cal 40 and 33.3% for the 2017 Dehler 46, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1963 Cal 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2017 Dehler 46 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 130L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1963 Cal 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2017 Dehler 46 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2017 Dehler 46 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1963 Cal 40 · 2017 Dehler 46