1963 Cal 40 vs Hanse 388 — Comparison
1963 Cal 40
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1963 Cal 40 | Hanse 388 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Cal | Hanse |
| Year | 1963–1972 | 2017 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Germany |
| Designer | Bill Lapworth | judel/vrolijk & co |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.19 m (40.0 ft) | 11.40 m (37.4 ft) |
| LWL | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) | 10.34 m (33.9 ft) |
| Beam | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) | 3.73 m (12.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 2.10 m (6.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,030 kg (15,498 lbs) | 7,200 kg (15,873 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) | 2,200 kg (4,850 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 61.3 m² (660 ft²) | 63.0 m² (678 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 22 HP | 29 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 140 L (37.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 260 L (68.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1963 Cal 40 and Hanse 388 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Cal 40 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the Hanse 388 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1963 Cal 40 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The Hanse 388 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.
In terms of size, the 1963 Cal 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the Hanse 388 at 11.40m (37.4ft) with a 3.73m beam. The 1963 Cal 40 is 0.79m longer than the Hanse 388. The Hanse 388 displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1963 Cal 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 61.3 m² of sail area. The Hanse 388, with an SA/D of 17.17 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 388 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1963 Cal 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Hanse 388 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the 1963 Cal 40 and 30.6% for the Hanse 388, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1963 Cal 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hanse 388 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 140L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1963 Cal 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 388 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1963 Cal 40 · Hanse 388