1963 Contessa 26 vs 1982 Freedom 28 — Comparison

1963 Contessa 26 1963 Contessa 26
VS
1982 Freedom 28 1982 Freedom 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1963 Contessa 26 1982 Freedom 28
General
Manufacturer Jeremy Rogers Freedom
Year 1963–1980 1982–1988
Type Sloop Sloop
Country UK USA
Designer David Sadler Garry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA 7.80 m (25.6 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL 5.79 m (19.0 ft) 7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam 2.29 m (7.5 ft) 2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft 1.22 m (4.0 ft) 1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast 1,043 kg (2,299 lbs) 907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 26.0 m² (280 ft²) 29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 7 HP 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 23 L (6.1 gal) 38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity 45 L (11.9 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 4 5
Cabins 1 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1963 Contessa 26
15.31
1982 Freedom 28
16.02
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1963 Contessa 26
45.99
1982 Freedom 28
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1963 Contessa 26
0.70
1982 Freedom 28
0.84
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1963 Contessa 26
28.29
1982 Freedom 28
17.13

Detailed Comparison

The 1963 Contessa 26 and 1982 Freedom 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Contessa 26 is a classic design by Jeremy Rogers from UK, while the 1982 Freedom 28 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 1963 Contessa 26 was penned by David Sadler. The 1982 Freedom 28 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 1963 Contessa 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.29m, compared to the 1982 Freedom 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1982 Freedom 28 is 0.73m longer than the 1963 Contessa 26. The 1982 Freedom 28 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1963 Contessa 26 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.31 and 26.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Freedom 28, with an SA/D of 16.02 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 Freedom 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1963 Contessa 26 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 28.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1982 Freedom 28 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.84. The ballast ratios are 46.0% for the 1963 Contessa 26 and 36.4% for the 1982 Freedom 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1963 Contessa 26 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 45L of water capacity and 23L of fuel. The 1982 Freedom 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1963 Contessa 26 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 Freedom 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Freedom 28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS